Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Jenny
Dear OSF,
This is Jenny.
She is your patient and was operated at OSF in 1999 for rheumatic heart disease.
She has done well over the past 10 years but needs to return to OSF for repeat heart surgery.
A founder of Haitian Hearts donated $23,000 cash to Paul Kramer at OSF-Children's Hospital of Illinois in 1999 for her surgery. This was money well spent.
Haitian Hearts will donate $10,000 more and my wife Maria and I will provide an additional $10,000 dollars if you will reaccept Jenny for heart surgery now. Please don't turn down $20,000 for repeat heart surgery.
Please give Jenny more time. She is a valuable member of Haitian society. And she is a human being.
Please follow OSF's Mission Statements.
Sincerely,
John
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Bishop Jenky Needs a Blog
I think Peoria's Bishop Daniel Jenky should start his own blog.
Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston has a blog that is called Cardinal Sean’s Blog.
Cardinal Sean posted on June 26, 2009 that Caritas Christi withdrew its membership in CeltiCare Health Plan.
“…our singular goal has been to provide for the needs of the poor and underserved in a manner that is fully and completely in accord with Catholic moral teaching.
Expansion of Caritas’ care for the poor and the uninsured was the original motivating force in entering the agreement with Celtic Group, Inc. (a subsidiary of Centene Corporation).
Catholic health care in the United States has two principal goals: providing health care for all, a basic requirement of social justice; and protecting the sacredness of human life from conception until natural death. The protection of human life and dignity demands that Catholic institutions never contribute to procedures which are inconsistent with Catholic moral teaching, such as abortion and sterilization. These procedures and others are prohibited by the Ethical and Religious Directives of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Having withdrawn from the original joint venture, the provider agreement will allow Caritas Christi to fulfill its mission of serving the poor without participation or cooperation in procedures forbidden by the moral teaching of the Catholic Church."
So what is all of this about?
Simply stated, Cardinal O’Malley did not want to be part and parcel of abortions in the Boston Diocese that would be covered by the HMO insurance package referenced above.
I would think that Bishop Jenky could explain on his blog why he is silent regarding Peoria’s OSF policy regarding oral contraceptives.
Bishop Jenky could also explain his silence regarding Humana/OSF HealthPlans offering sterilization and a long list of oral contraceptives in its formulary.
Cardinal O’Malley mentioned in his most recent post the US Bishop’s support for Bishop John D’Arcy and the way he handled the University of Notre Dame (UND) debacle with President Obama. Again, Bishop Jenky could use his blog to explain how he voted as a Trustee of UND regarding President Obama's invitation to Notre Dame. Bishop Jenky could also explain his silence regarding President Obama’s appearance at UND.
What this boils down to in Peoria is that Bishop Jenky should not accept a "little bit of evil" in exchange for the "financial greater good" of OSF in Peoria.
Clearly, Bishop Jenky has lost his courage regarding serious teachings of the Catholic Church, and Cardinal O'Malley has not.
-------------------------
Below is an article from the Boston Globe from June 11, 2009.
Judie Brown of the American Life League is quoted. Ms. Brown is well aware of what is happening in the Catholic Diocese of Peoria and has written to Bishop Jenky.
Isn't amazing that lay people like Ms. Brown need to "encourage" Cardinals and Bishops to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church?
The Boston Globe
Caritas insurance deal faces changes
Provider's link to abortion criticized
By Michael Paulson and Kay Lazar, Globe Staff | June 11, 2009
Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley, concerned about the relationship between Caritas Christi Health Care and an insurance plan that covers abortions, is seeking modifications to the joint venture that the beleaguered Catholic hospital chain has entered into with a St. Louis-based healthcare company to provide insurance to low-income Massachusetts residents.
O'Malley, who has been criticized by several conservative Catholic and antiabortion activists for his handling of the Caritas venture, issued a statement yesterday declaring that "under no circumstances" will Caritas provide or refer patients for procedures prohibited by Catholic teaching, which include abortion, contraception, and sterilization.
And the Archdiocese of Boston said publicly for the first time yesterday that Caritas would not be permitted to profit from the provision of abortion services by others.
The archdiocese would not specify the changes it is seeking to the joint venture, called CeltiCare, which is 49 percent owned by Caritas Christi.
But the church sought to clarify its requirements for the deal after a number of conservative bloggers and interest groups had recently criticized the venture, accusing O'Malley, often in quite angry language, of abandoning the church's commitment to protecting the unborn.
This week, many of the activists have seized upon, as evidence of the problematic nature of the venture, the new website of CeltiCare. The website specifies the copayments for abortions (from 0 to $100, depending on the plan), and lists family planning and reproductive service providers, including Planned Parenthood facilities in Boston, Somerville, and Worcester.
The president of Caritas Christi, Dr. Ralph de la Torre, issued a statement yesterday saying that individuals covered under the new venture will be told to talk to their insurance company if they seek abortions or other services prohibited by Catholic teaching.
"When a patient seeks such a procedure, Caritas healthcare professionals will be clear that (a) the hospital does not perform them and (b) the patient must turn to his or her insurer for further guidance," de la Torre said. "This, in fact, is the practice currently in place in the Caritas system as we work with other insurance companies under state laws that mandate access to procedures not provided within the Caritas system."
The joint venture, with Centene Corp. of St. Louis, will provide health insurance to thousands of low-income residents of Massachusetts under the Commonwealth Care program, a state-subsidized health insurance program for the working poor. The companies have said that CeltiCare is 51 percent owned by a subsidiary of Centene and 49 percent owned by Caritas Christi, which is incorporated independently from the archdiocese but has a Catholic identity overseen by the archbishop of Boston.
The hospitals are facing time pressure to resolve the cardinal's concerns, because CeltiCare has already begun enrolling low-income people and is supposed to begin providing them with health insurance coverage July 1. Neither the state Connector Authority, which oversees Commonwealth Care, nor CeltiCare would say how many residents have signed up for coverage.
The archdiocese said it is optimistic that Caritas will be able to renegotiate its arrangement with Centene in a way that will be acceptable to the cardinal, who is obligated under church law to ensure that Catholic hospitals in the archdiocese comply with Catholic healthcare ethics.
The cardinal is eager to find a way to make the venture work, because it will serve the poor, which is a priority of the church, and because it will help the Caritas chain, which has had financial problems. But the archdiocese said that the cardinal cannot compromise on the church's ethical directives for Catholic hospitals and that if the final deal does not comply with his understanding of those directives, he will be obligated to block the venture.
The archdiocese would not say yesterday whether the ownership structure of CeltiCare would change, but a statement from the archdiocese and Caritas said, "Caritas is in active discussions with Celtic Group [a Centene subsidiary] and CeltiCare with a view to making acceptable modifications to their arrangement." Centene referred questions to CeltiCare, and its spokesman said he had no comment.
Some of the cardinal's critics are applying a tougher standard to the deal than are many moral theologians and Catholic healthcare officials, who have said that the issue here is whether Caritas is "cooperating with the evil of abortion."
Judie Brown, president of the American Life League, an antiabortion organization, said she does not believe there is any way to modify the arrangement that would make it acceptable.
"Caritas Christi has been put in a position of having to align itself with a provider that does provide abortions, contraception, and sterilization, and it would be crippling to the Catholic identity of Caritas Christi, and therefore the credibility of the archdiocese, if this agreement were to go forward in any way," Brown said.
Brown said she believes the Caritas arrangement is not unusual among Catholic hospitals, and said, "This is a scandal throughout the church."
Brian Delaney, a spokesman for CeltiCare, said an abortion rights group, NARAL Pro-Choice of Massachusetts, will serve on an advisory group for the health plan but he did not know whether any Catholic groups would be on the panel.
Andrea Miller, NARAL executive director, said of the possible modifications to the venture: "The real question is how this plays out in the real world. If it turns out this process of refusing to provide even referrals and sending patients back to health plans creates a barrier to low- or lower-income people obtaining care that they need and have a right to, we will have to . . . ask some hard questions."
Paulson can be reached at mpaulson@globe.com; Lazar at klazar@globe.com.
© Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company
Cardinal Sean O’Malley of Boston has a blog that is called Cardinal Sean’s Blog.
Cardinal Sean posted on June 26, 2009 that Caritas Christi withdrew its membership in CeltiCare Health Plan.
“…our singular goal has been to provide for the needs of the poor and underserved in a manner that is fully and completely in accord with Catholic moral teaching.
Expansion of Caritas’ care for the poor and the uninsured was the original motivating force in entering the agreement with Celtic Group, Inc. (a subsidiary of Centene Corporation).
Catholic health care in the United States has two principal goals: providing health care for all, a basic requirement of social justice; and protecting the sacredness of human life from conception until natural death. The protection of human life and dignity demands that Catholic institutions never contribute to procedures which are inconsistent with Catholic moral teaching, such as abortion and sterilization. These procedures and others are prohibited by the Ethical and Religious Directives of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Having withdrawn from the original joint venture, the provider agreement will allow Caritas Christi to fulfill its mission of serving the poor without participation or cooperation in procedures forbidden by the moral teaching of the Catholic Church."
So what is all of this about?
Simply stated, Cardinal O’Malley did not want to be part and parcel of abortions in the Boston Diocese that would be covered by the HMO insurance package referenced above.
I would think that Bishop Jenky could explain on his blog why he is silent regarding Peoria’s OSF policy regarding oral contraceptives.
Bishop Jenky could also explain his silence regarding Humana/OSF HealthPlans offering sterilization and a long list of oral contraceptives in its formulary.
Cardinal O’Malley mentioned in his most recent post the US Bishop’s support for Bishop John D’Arcy and the way he handled the University of Notre Dame (UND) debacle with President Obama. Again, Bishop Jenky could use his blog to explain how he voted as a Trustee of UND regarding President Obama's invitation to Notre Dame. Bishop Jenky could also explain his silence regarding President Obama’s appearance at UND.
What this boils down to in Peoria is that Bishop Jenky should not accept a "little bit of evil" in exchange for the "financial greater good" of OSF in Peoria.
Clearly, Bishop Jenky has lost his courage regarding serious teachings of the Catholic Church, and Cardinal O'Malley has not.
-------------------------
Below is an article from the Boston Globe from June 11, 2009.
Judie Brown of the American Life League is quoted. Ms. Brown is well aware of what is happening in the Catholic Diocese of Peoria and has written to Bishop Jenky.
Isn't amazing that lay people like Ms. Brown need to "encourage" Cardinals and Bishops to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church?
The Boston Globe
Caritas insurance deal faces changes
Provider's link to abortion criticized
By Michael Paulson and Kay Lazar, Globe Staff | June 11, 2009
Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley, concerned about the relationship between Caritas Christi Health Care and an insurance plan that covers abortions, is seeking modifications to the joint venture that the beleaguered Catholic hospital chain has entered into with a St. Louis-based healthcare company to provide insurance to low-income Massachusetts residents.
O'Malley, who has been criticized by several conservative Catholic and antiabortion activists for his handling of the Caritas venture, issued a statement yesterday declaring that "under no circumstances" will Caritas provide or refer patients for procedures prohibited by Catholic teaching, which include abortion, contraception, and sterilization.
And the Archdiocese of Boston said publicly for the first time yesterday that Caritas would not be permitted to profit from the provision of abortion services by others.
The archdiocese would not specify the changes it is seeking to the joint venture, called CeltiCare, which is 49 percent owned by Caritas Christi.
But the church sought to clarify its requirements for the deal after a number of conservative bloggers and interest groups had recently criticized the venture, accusing O'Malley, often in quite angry language, of abandoning the church's commitment to protecting the unborn.
This week, many of the activists have seized upon, as evidence of the problematic nature of the venture, the new website of CeltiCare. The website specifies the copayments for abortions (from 0 to $100, depending on the plan), and lists family planning and reproductive service providers, including Planned Parenthood facilities in Boston, Somerville, and Worcester.
The president of Caritas Christi, Dr. Ralph de la Torre, issued a statement yesterday saying that individuals covered under the new venture will be told to talk to their insurance company if they seek abortions or other services prohibited by Catholic teaching.
"When a patient seeks such a procedure, Caritas healthcare professionals will be clear that (a) the hospital does not perform them and (b) the patient must turn to his or her insurer for further guidance," de la Torre said. "This, in fact, is the practice currently in place in the Caritas system as we work with other insurance companies under state laws that mandate access to procedures not provided within the Caritas system."
The joint venture, with Centene Corp. of St. Louis, will provide health insurance to thousands of low-income residents of Massachusetts under the Commonwealth Care program, a state-subsidized health insurance program for the working poor. The companies have said that CeltiCare is 51 percent owned by a subsidiary of Centene and 49 percent owned by Caritas Christi, which is incorporated independently from the archdiocese but has a Catholic identity overseen by the archbishop of Boston.
The hospitals are facing time pressure to resolve the cardinal's concerns, because CeltiCare has already begun enrolling low-income people and is supposed to begin providing them with health insurance coverage July 1. Neither the state Connector Authority, which oversees Commonwealth Care, nor CeltiCare would say how many residents have signed up for coverage.
The archdiocese said it is optimistic that Caritas will be able to renegotiate its arrangement with Centene in a way that will be acceptable to the cardinal, who is obligated under church law to ensure that Catholic hospitals in the archdiocese comply with Catholic healthcare ethics.
The cardinal is eager to find a way to make the venture work, because it will serve the poor, which is a priority of the church, and because it will help the Caritas chain, which has had financial problems. But the archdiocese said that the cardinal cannot compromise on the church's ethical directives for Catholic hospitals and that if the final deal does not comply with his understanding of those directives, he will be obligated to block the venture.
The archdiocese would not say yesterday whether the ownership structure of CeltiCare would change, but a statement from the archdiocese and Caritas said, "Caritas is in active discussions with Celtic Group [a Centene subsidiary] and CeltiCare with a view to making acceptable modifications to their arrangement." Centene referred questions to CeltiCare, and its spokesman said he had no comment.
Some of the cardinal's critics are applying a tougher standard to the deal than are many moral theologians and Catholic healthcare officials, who have said that the issue here is whether Caritas is "cooperating with the evil of abortion."
Judie Brown, president of the American Life League, an antiabortion organization, said she does not believe there is any way to modify the arrangement that would make it acceptable.
"Caritas Christi has been put in a position of having to align itself with a provider that does provide abortions, contraception, and sterilization, and it would be crippling to the Catholic identity of Caritas Christi, and therefore the credibility of the archdiocese, if this agreement were to go forward in any way," Brown said.
Brown said she believes the Caritas arrangement is not unusual among Catholic hospitals, and said, "This is a scandal throughout the church."
Brian Delaney, a spokesman for CeltiCare, said an abortion rights group, NARAL Pro-Choice of Massachusetts, will serve on an advisory group for the health plan but he did not know whether any Catholic groups would be on the panel.
Andrea Miller, NARAL executive director, said of the possible modifications to the venture: "The real question is how this plays out in the real world. If it turns out this process of refusing to provide even referrals and sending patients back to health plans creates a barrier to low- or lower-income people obtaining care that they need and have a right to, we will have to . . . ask some hard questions."
Paulson can be reached at mpaulson@globe.com; Lazar at klazar@globe.com.
© Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Haitian Hearts has Another Patient Accepted Today
We are very fortunate to have had another heart patient accepted today.
He is an 18 year old young man who was operated several years ago at a large, well known medical center.
He needs to be reoperated and the medical center accepted him back for no charge.
Haitian Hearts has had numerous heart patients that needed repeat surgery. All were accepted back to the medical centers where they were originally operated....except OSF in Peoria.
OSF has abandonded their Haitian Hearts patients and is letting them die.
He is an 18 year old young man who was operated several years ago at a large, well known medical center.
He needs to be reoperated and the medical center accepted him back for no charge.
Haitian Hearts has had numerous heart patients that needed repeat surgery. All were accepted back to the medical centers where they were originally operated....except OSF in Peoria.
OSF has abandonded their Haitian Hearts patients and is letting them die.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Peoria's Beleagured Bishop...a Moral Dilemma
I believe that Bishop Jenky was probably a much happier fellow at University of Notre Dame (UND). And I think he would go back to South Bend in a minute.
When I met with Bishop Jenky in his Chancery office in Peoria in February 2003, I felt like I was talking to a man who was very afraid.
I thought he was afraid of Peoria’s local politics.
I thought he was afraid of OSF and Caterpillar Inc., Peoria's largest employers.
I thought that he was afraid for the financial future of the Catholic Diocese of Peoria.
I thought he was afraid to support dying Haitian children.
And even though Bishop Jenky threatened me in the Chancery, I thought he was angry at himself and others, not at me.
I had picketed OSF in January, 2003 after OSF had notified the American Consulate in Haiti. This action stopped my Haitian patients from coming to OSF in Peoria for medical care and cost some of them their lives. The sign I carried in front of OSF questioned OSF's respect for life.
OSF needed to get Bishop Jenky involved because OSF was causing a public relations nightmare. They saw no way out without Bishop Jenky at their side.
At that time I did not know that OSF had a contraceptive accommodation or that Bishop Jenky was going along with OSF’s policy of allowing OSF physicians to write prescriptions for oral contraceptives. This policy had been approved under Bishop John Myers in the mid-90's. Bishop Jenky had inherited this local scandal, and behind the scenes, was allowing it to continue to flourish to help OSF's pocketbook. It was simply money over morality.
According to Catholic teaching, OSF’s contraceptive policy and Bishop Jenky’s acquiescence are not pro-life. My sign questioning OSF's respect for life for Haitians hit them harder than I expected.
So what has happened at OSF and with Bishop Jenky since I picketed the hospital in 2003?
Some of my Haitian kids have died. And OSF is still contacting the US Consulate in Haiti and Cleveland Clinic in Ohio regarding confidential information about my Haitian patients that they have no right or need to know. Bishop Jenky remains silent about this.
OSF’s contraceptive practice continues, and Bishop Jenky maintains his silence regarding this too.
Bishop Jenky is a Fellow and Trustee at the University of Notre Dame (UND). Any comments he had regarding the UND scandal allowing President Obama to give the commencement address was kept below the media radar.
And since 2003 I have learned much about how dysfunctional the Church hierarchy really is.
Is Bishop Jenky conservative or liberal? It totally depends upon where the money is.
Trying to stop President Obama from speaking at UND would not have been good for Bishop Jenky, so he took a silent, safer, and liberal approach.
And he took a conservative approach with his public silence regarding OSF’s abandonment of Haitian Hearts patients. What OSF is doing, allowing their Haitian kids to die, is against moral and ethical standards, and Bishop Jenky has said nothing in the media. (If he is talking to OSF privately, it isn't working.)
As mentioned above, Bishop Jenky has been silent about OSF’s contraceptive practice, which obviously would be a liberal approach. I wonder how much OSF contributes to the Diocese?
His "flip-flop" approaches are consistent only in that they do follow the money each time.
Cardinal Francis George, who is also president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, was described by George Weigel as “one of the most articulate critics of Notre Dame’s decision to honor a president who manifestly does not share what Notre Dame claims is its institutional commitment to the Church’s defense of life.” Interestingly, Cardinal George requests Temporary Protected Status for Haitians.
Cardinal George's statements in Chicago seems world's away from what is happening just down the interstate from him in the Catholic Diocese of Peoria.
My Catholic pro life friends say how we need to pray for the culture of life in Peoria. This is true but we need to pray that Bishop Jenky finds the courage to demand that his Catholic hospital respect the culture of life, which they are not doing. And that includes Haitians.
In conclusion, quoting from a pro life friend of mine who quotes from this link:
http://www.zenit.org/article-26023?l=english
To hearten and encourage us all, when we find ourselves confronting bishops, archbishops, and even cardinals:
Laypeople are not merely the clergy's collaborators, but rather share in the responsibility of the Church's ministry, says Benedict XVI.
"There should be a renewed becoming aware of our being Church and of the pastoral co-responsibility that, in the name of Christ, all of us are called to carry out," the Holy Father said. This co-responsibility should advance "respect for vocations and for the functions of consecrated persons and laypeople," he added.
The Pontiff acknowledged that this requires a "change of mentality," especially regarding laypeople, shifting from "considering themselves collaborators of the clergy to recognizing themselves truly as 'co-responsible' for the being and action of the Church, favoring the consolidation of a mature and committed laity."
The Bishop of Rome suggested that "there is still a tendency to unilaterally identify the Church with the hierarchy, forgetting the common responsibility, the common mission" of all the baptized.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)